Sunday, May 17, 2009

AWESOME

must check!!!

陶 傑 試 做 通 識 科 樣 版 試 卷

9 comments:

小瓶子 said...

通识有得甘样考试0羊? 香港教育真系痴Q线啦!

聶秀康 said...

香港教育無聊兼on 9 之作!

laulong said...

我同嗰班教育局考評局通識搞手交過手,成班低 B 人。

你教叻班學生去考試,愈叻愈死!

Unreality 泡影 said...

真係要搵個勁些少既教育局局長

pakman said...

Ha!

Seems like this is topic de jour.

Even I wrote about that for tmr's newspaper...

Indeed fun.

篤篤篤撐 said...

問題唔單止出題有問題, 而且, 邊D人有資格批判其它人既思考水平呢 ?
我識好多老師在這方面都唔掂

好友D said...

I think if I am writing a non-examination piece, I am less obliged to insert references. However if it is in an examination setting, the test taker cannot just put in argument assuming the marker knows the reference or believes the test taker knows the reference.

When doing math proofs, we cannot just jump from step 1 to conclusion using "obviously" and expect to get away with it.

hehehahavevewawa said...

而家的老師好多都未夠思考水評,還說教別人思考?好得人驚!

Anonymous said...

唓,我唔覺「哦岑」,反而覺得可能會「哦L」咋 !!

多嘴兼八卦嘅神秘大叔

 
Clicky Web Analytics